Pages

Obama has proven that he doesn't respect democracy, when he told Russia that he would be more flexible after the election

Background, context, and assumptions:

"This is my last election," Obama said, leaning close to Medvedev after a bilateral meeting held here as part of a nuclear security summit. "After my election, I have more flexibility."

Reasons to agree:
  1. Someone who respects democracy would tell us what he honestly believes, and try to persuade us that their opinions are correct. Unstead of saying they can't do what they REALLY want to do until after the election, when they won't be held accountable by democracy. 
R2A(+): 1       R2AA(+): 0       R2DA(-): 0    


Web-pages that agree:


Values that agree:

  1. Transparency. If Obama wants to do something with Russia he should be transparent and tell us what it is. He should trust us, or we can't trust him.

Romney will properly balance environmental and business needs. Obama won't


Background, Context, and assumptions:
Reasons to agree:

Romney is more likely to support "1 person 1 vote" by fighting voter fraud

Background and Context



In order to protect voter rights we must prevent voter fraud. 
    If some people are able to vote twice, than harms law abiding people's rights. 
    It is not discrimination to require a photo ID in order to vote. 
        If we have to have a photo ID to drive, you should have to have one to vote.
        If we don't require photo IDs the vote will become more corrupt. 

Reasons to agree:
  1. Obama's Justice Department announced that it was prohibiting the implementation of a Texas law requiring voters to present photo identification, claiming that it violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act (the DOJ had taken similar action against South Carolina in December). Both cases are based on tortured rationales that requiring photo identification — which both states will provide to voters for free — discriminates against minority voters. 

Romney is more likely than Obama to Protect the secret ballot


Background, Context, and assumptions
We should protect the secret ballot. Union bosses want to remove the secret ballot so they can intimidate and threaten those who don't vote to support the union. Removing the secret ballot is un-american. We all have the right to vote how we want without fear of intimidation. Even Russia has the secret ballet. Even Iraq has the secret ballot. It would be sad if we send our solders over seas to start democracy in the desert, and we let Obama remove the secret ballot here at home. 

Reasons to agree:
  1. President Obama Supports The Employee Free Choice Act, Which Would Eliminate Secret-Ballot Elections That Shield Workers From Privacy Concerns And Intimidation. “President Barack Obama told AFL-CIO union leaders Tuesday in a videotaped address that the controversial Employee Free Choice Act will pass, signaling his full backing for legislation that makes union organizing easier. … The bill would make it easier for unions to recruit workers because it would let them join unions simply by signing cards rather than through secret-ballot elections in which companies can campaign against the union.” (Kris Maher, “President Tells Unions Organizing Act Will Pass,” The Wall Street Journal, 3/4/09)
  2. "I will protect the right of American workers to vote by secret ballot. And I will fight to stop union bosses from using the dues of their union members to support those bosses' favorite campaigns." (Mitt Romney Delivers Remarks at Values Voter Summit, October 8, 2011)
R2A(+): 2       R2AA(+): 0       R2DA(-): 0    
Images that agree

Romney is more likely to balance the budget than Obama

Background, context, and assumptions:
  1. Romney has never had an unbalanced budget as Governor. Obama has never had a balanced budget as president.  
  2. Obama has done a very bad job with balancing the budget
  3. Romney has seriously addressed entitlement spending. Obama hasn't. Romney has a plan that balances the budget. Obama doesn't. 
  4. Romney balanced the budget in 2003, as Governor Massachusetts. 
  5. Romney balanced the budget in 2004, as Governor Massachusetts. 
  6. Romney balanced the budget in 2005, as Governor Massachusetts. 
  7. Romney balanced the budget in 2006, as Governor Massachusetts. 
  8. Romney was able to leave money in the rainy day fund, even though he faced a 3 billion dollar budget deficit when he came into office. 
  9. Romney turned around budget problems at the Winter Olympics, which was $239 million dollars short (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Winter_Olympic_bid_scandal)
  10. Romney has promised to only spend money on things that we can justify borrowing money from China for to pay for. 
  11. Romney balanced the budget for many companies. Romney was willing to make tough choices in his business life that resulted in balanced budgets for the organizations that he ran, including Bain consulting, Bain Capital, and the many companies that he bought, and ran. 
  12. Obama has done a very bad job with balancing the budget
  13. Romney supports the line item veto which would reduce federal spending.
  14. We should only select presidential candidates who have previously balanced their states budget as Governor. Romney balanced the budget all 4 years in office, without raising taxes. 



Romney and his Dog Seamus

This is a photo I took in Yellowstone last summer. As you can see it is a Christian sticker Bedazzled motorcycle. The owner of the bike also owns a dog. Instead of leaving the dog he purchased a trailer for his bike, to which he secured a dog carrier with awesome bull horns, and additional decorations.
This man took a lot of time to make sure his dog was happy. The dog obviously looks very happy. He is not trying to get away. He loves his owner, and obviously his owner loves him.
Here is a picture of Mitt with his dog when he was about the age that Obama was eating dog:
Mitt Romney Dog
Do you think the press will ask Obama if it tasted like Chicken? Do you think they will spend near the amount of time that they have spent pestering Romney? We'll see. 

Chicago Tribune: Editorial: For the Republicans, Romney

www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-chicago-tribune-endorses-romney,0,824934.story
chicagotribune.com
Editorial: For the Republicans, Romney

5:40 PM CDT, March 16, 2012

This year, as rarely before, the presidential primary campaign lands in Illinois as a work very much in progress. The Democrats? They've settled on a candidate. But Republicans in the Land of, yes, Lincoln have urgent work to do — for their debt-besotted nation and their ostentatiously divided party.

America first: The United States — its people's sense of normalcy and, more gravely, their future prosperity — is in danger. Our national debt, trudging toward $16 trillion, exceeds the size of our economy. We owe more than we produce. And we are borrowing an additional $3 million every minute. As in the insolvent state of Illinois, debt repayment to lenders such as China increasingly crowds out spending on other priorities. Today's Washington isn't oblivious. Just useless.

Before we talk politics, consider: Entitlement costs and other "payments to individuals" now consume two-thirds of our federal budget. And with only a relative few baby boomers already 65, spending on retirees will explode. This lethal pathology — neither Medicare nor Social Security can survive as is — threatens the career incomes of our children and grandchildren. They will spend their work lives as indentured servants to their elders.

Who might engineer a fix? Only one of the four Republicans still in this primary race has the personal skill set, the painfully won experience, to appreciate this peril and to guide Americans through their own financial rescue. For many of those Americans, the nation's debt debacle still seems drab, dense, something to think about tomorrow. Yet it risks shrinking and marginalizing our country's future and global influence, just as debt debacles are shrinking and marginalizing much of Europe.

While three of the Republican candidates were giving speeches and casting votes in Congress, one of these four was managing, and sometimes salvaging, large enterprises in the public and private sectors. One of these four was forced to make costly organizations live, however unpleasantly, within their means. One of these four was learning what it is to live with the often good, sometimes bad, consequences of his executive decisions.

For his demonstrated abilities and the economic pragmatism at his core, the Tribune endorses former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts as the Republicans' best, most responsible choice in Tuesday's Illinois primary. The other three contestants, for lack of Romney's credibility on this threat to the American way, can only try to talk a good game. We're far more confident that Romney is the candidate best equipped to keep the U.S. from devolving into New Europe.

We say that with one large caveat: Romney has talked too much in generalities, and with come-and-go candor, about the radical restructuring that healthier spending and debt levels will require.

Romney's tax and spending proposals would create more federal debt over the next 10 years than President Obama's proposed budget plans, according to U.S. Budget Watch, a project of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Yes, that's in part because Obama envisions higher tax revenues and Romney would reduce tax revenues.

Romney has this advantage: GOP rivals Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum would create even more debt, according to the U.S. Budget Watch analysis. (Ron Paul would come closest to balance.)

Come November, partisans in both parties will be tempted to ignore their nominee's failure to deal with this debt bomb. The nation can't do that. Voters have to demand more discipline from Obama and from the Republican candidate.

One more advantage for Romney: He is the candidate most likely to steer the Republican Party toward its traditional values: financial responsibility, economic (and thus job) growth, social tolerance, and a limited role for government in the lives of the governed. That does not necessitate alienating tea partiers and social conservatives, many of them motivated by the irresponsible expansion of our national debt; for nearly three years they have been the most energetic force in American politics. It does, though, mean hewing to a strategy perfected by Ronald Reagan: Recruit to your big tent everyone who agrees with you on something, not just those who agree with you on everything.

Presidential primaries are not for electing. They're for nominating candidates who, by talent and temperament, are qualified to lead and inspire all Americans. Romney is the least polarizing candidate in today's Republican field. He projects maturity and calm. He's fit to apply conservative ideals to the messy business of governing.

Copyright © 2012, Chicago Tribune

Ann Romney joins Bruce & Dan in for Don & Roma

To listen click here.
Please leave a comment if you would like to add a Reason to agree or disagree, probable interest of those who agree or disagree, webpages or books that agree or disagree.

Want to Help?

From Illinois? Here is my contact info. Send me an e-mail and I might let you help post!