
Press releases from Romney's Massachusetts Governorship, and posts from 2008 and 2012 when I supported him.
Liberals hate businessmen.
It is a good thing Hillary Clinton never worked for an evil corporation. Oh wait, she worked for Wal-Mart. My bad.
Explanation: I copied and pasted all of Governor Mitt Romney's press releases from his site, just in case they go away when he is no longer governor. Then I started copying quotes from the press releases, into each subject's page, as seen below. Next I want to make a list of actions from each press release, and start going through the press releases, creating links within this web page, and getting all the good content out. If you want to help I can try to explain better what I think still needs to be done, and how to do it.
http://johnandcisco.townhall.com/
Cisco this morning gave the standard explanation of how a candidate from Massachusetts can run for president. He said Romney has changed his position on everything, and that he is now Running against Massachusetts. Then he turned around and said that Fred Thompson was viable because he could say that he has been to Washington, and Hollywood and could say that he hated them both. John tried to say that Rudy is doing the same thing as Romney. Speaking up their ability to work with the democrats, and pointing out the difficult political battles they had to fight in Massachusetts and New York City.
Cisco tries to come across as the smart one, but it falls pretty flat some times. John asked how what Romney is doing is different than Rudy. Cisco ignored that, and went on to totally contradict himself with the Fred Thompson can win by running against Washington and Hollywood.
Cisco is trying to have it both ways, saying Thompson can run against Hollywood and Washington, but Mitt can't mention the battles he had in Massachusetts .
Cisco explained his contradiction by saying that Romney changed. He used to be liberal now he is conservative. This just is not a fact, and I am tired of listening to people who get paid to tell us what they think that are too lazy to even read a wikipedia article about the people they are talking about.
If Cisco read Mitt Romney's wikipedia article, he would realize that abortion is the only thing Mitt has changed.
But people don't believe it. They don't see a conservative could have won in Massachusetts, so they just assume Mitt Romney has changed. The fact of the matter is that Mitt Romney ran on competence, and even people in Massachusetts don't like to pay higher taxes. Even people in Massachusetts don't like gross incompetence. Even people in Massachusetts want someone who did well in school. Mitt Romney graduated at the top of his class with two degrees in Harvard in 5 years. As a baker scholar from Harvard Business school, and Cume Lade from Harvard Law school. The person that Mitt Romney beat for Governor was too liberal even for Massachusetts. People in Massachusetts liked that Romney was able to turn around Bain Capital, hundred of struggling companies, and the 2002 winter Olympics.
Cisco needs to read these links:
http://myclob.pbwiki.com/flip-flop
http://www.politico.com/pdf/wmr_1994_senate_flier_side_1.pdf
http://www.politico.com/pdf/wmr_1994_senate_flier_side_1.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney
The immigration reform debate may be shaking up the race for the Republican Presidential nomination. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney has inched past Arizona Senator John McCain for second place in the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll. Just two weeks ago, Romney was in fourth place among GOP hopefuls.
This week, Giuliani is followed by Romney at 16%, McCain at 15%, and former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson at 12%. While Romney's one-point edge over McCain is statistically insignificant, it's worth noting that McCain had a six-point advantage over Romney just two weeks ago.
McCain, once considered the dominant frontrunner, has been strongly supportive of the immigration reform bill being debated in the Senate. That bill is unpopular with the general public— just 26% of voters favor its passage.
Romney has announced his strong opposition to the immigration bill and Giuliani called it a "hodgepodge… without any central focus." Thompson said "We should scrap this bill and the whole debate until we can convince the American people that we have secured the borders or at least have made great headway." Most Americans are willing to support an enforcement-only approach at this time.
On Wednesday, Rasmussen Reports will release updated polling data on support for the Senate immigration bill.
Rasmussen Reports releases updated polling data on the Republican nominating contest every Tuesday. Results for the Democrats are updated on Mondays. The current survey is based upon national telephone interviews with 467 Likely Republican Primary Voters conducted May 21-23, 2007. The margin of sampling error is +/- 5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. The Rasmussen Reports sample includes not only Republicans, but also independents who say they are likely to vote in a Republican Primary.
Among all voters nationwide, 27% say the will definitely vote for Giuliani if he is on the ballot in 2008 . Thirty-seven percent (37%) will definitely vote against. The numbers are identical for McCain. Eighteen percent (18%) will definitely vote for Romney while 36% are poised to vote against him. For Thompson, it's 22% definitely for and 30% definitely against.
Rasmussen Reports releases updated polling data on the Democrat Nomination Process every Monday and on the Republican contest every Tuesday. Results for the Generic Congressional Ballot are updated monthly.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Rasmussen Reports' Election 2006 coverage has been praised for its accuracy and reliability. Michael Barone, Senior Writer for U.S. News & World Report and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, mentions, "One clear lesson from the Republican victory of 2004 and the Democratic victory of 2006 is that the best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com." And University of Virginia Professor Larry Sabato states, "In election campaigns, I've learned to look for the Rasmussen results. In my experience, they are right on the money. There is no question Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today."
Rasmussen Reports was also the nation's most accurate polling firm during the 2004 Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During both Election 2004 and Election 2006, RasmussenReports.com was the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
Good morning.
In the past four years, I have spoken with service men and women from every part of our Commonwealth. I have met their families – parents, wives and husbands, and children. We have spoken in the anxious days and hours before deployment to far-off and dangerous places. And, I've welcomed our service men and women home.
Their sacrifices inspire – there's the star athlete who now walks with a cane, the proud hero who taught himself how to tie his shoes with an aluminum arm. And then, there were others who did not return. Army Lt. Derek Hines, a 25-year-old known for his love of hockey and infectious grin, was struck down in a firefight in Afghanistan. I met yesterday with the grieving 20-year-old widow of Edward Garvin, Lance Corporal – she and her husband were best friends since the 2nd grade, then sweethearts. He was killed 40 days after his deployment to Iraq.
In these last few years, I have attended almost 40 funerals and wakes. Every fallen soldier, every wounded veteran, every grieving loved one, paid the price for freedom and for peace. All they require of us is to care for those they left behind, to console and to shelter, and to remember the immeasurable debt we owe.
New heroes are paying the price, even today. I fear that freedom will always exact a heavy toll, until perhaps, at last, the Creator will say, "It is finished." Oh how I wish peace and freedom could be won without so dear a price, without conflict, without soldiers, without war, without death. The history of mankind tells a very different story. Think of the human toll: the people who died in the last century because of organized violence was over 160 million.
The sad lesson of history is that war is not a rare or random occurrence that can be wished away by those of us who love peace. In the years since our nation's founding, no American has reached their 50th birthday without having lived through at least two major U.S. wars.
The best ally of peace is a strong America, an America with unparalleled strength and resolve, an America fully engaged in every imaginable effort to pursue peace, and an America committed to lead others toward liberty. As Ronald Reagan once said, "I have seen four wars during my lifetime and none of them began because America was too strong."
This day marks the signing of the armistice that ended the First World War -- at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, 88 years ago. Some claimed that World War I was "the war to end all wars," but they had forgotten the lessons of history. General Douglas MacArthur, himself a veteran of World War I, said that old soldiers never die, they just fade away. Almost all of the nearly 5 million American veterans of that war have faded away with General MacArthur.
But, astonishingly, there are two Massachusetts citizens, veterans of that awful conflict, who are alive today. Please hold your applause until I've introduced them both.
Antonio Pierro of Swampscott was an Army Private in the 320th Field Artillery Regiment, 82d Division. He fought in France at the battle of St. Michel and the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, the final campaign of the war. If life is a journey, Private Pierro's life is an expedition: He was born in 1896 in a small town in Italy. What a long way he has traveled: from the 19th Century to the 21st; from a mountaintop village in Italy to Swampscott, Massachusetts.
Russell Buchanan, of Watertown, tried to join the Marines to fight in World War One, but he was turned down. He turned to the Navy, but at 115 pounds, he didn't weigh enough to meet the Navy's 118-pound cutoff. So he worked hard, gained the extra three pounds, and joined the Navy in July of 1918. His duty to serve didn't end there either: sensing that America would soon enter World War II, he enlisted again, 10 months before Pearl Harbor. This time he joined the Army, where he served as a technical sergeant and was sent to Europe as a member of 26th Yankee Division of General George Patton's 3d Army.
Gentleman, will you please stand so that we may recognize you? (Long applause)
There is a great continuous chain of service, linking every American generation – past, present, and future – through love of this country and all that it stands for. Every veteran is a link in that chain. They are the senior members in the half-a-million strong group of proud military veterans in our Commonwealth.
Recognition takes on many forms. We have our disagreements in politics, but making sure that our veterans are honored and appreciated is one issue that all but erases party differences. I'd like to thank the legislature for working with me to enact important measures like the Welcome Home Bill to help ensure that Massachusetts veterans and Guard personnel receive the benefits they deserve.
But none of that ever balances the scale: there is nothing that we can do to match our gratitude for the men and women who risk everything they have to defend this nation. America will always be producing veterans, as long as there are people outside our borders who hate freedom and people inside them who love it.
Reasons to agree:
| Symbol | Bid | Ask | Last | Low | High | Average |
| GIUL_NOM | 0.227 | 0.246 | 0.227 | 0.227 | 0.247 | 0.236 |
| MCCA_NOM | 0.161 | 0.199 | 0.195 | 0.195 | 0.197 | 0.195 |
| ROMN_NOM | 0.250 | 0.259 | 0.245 | 0.229 | 0.245 | 0.238 |
|
This stuff is legit: The Iowa Electronic Markets are operated by faculty at the University of Iowa Henry B. Tippie College of Business as part of our research and teaching mission. These markets are small-scale, real-money futures markets where contract payoffs depend on economic and political events such as elections. We, and many of our colleagues at other institutions, use the markets in classes as a pedagogical tool. We have found them to be an excellent way to focus attention and give hands-on experience with real-world markets. As a research tool, the markets provide us with an unparalleled laboratory in which we can study individual trading behavior as well as market level performance. The quality of our data is improved by interested traders participating in the markets. We invite you to join us in our research and teaching mission. For additional information about our markets, please see the following pages:
I think we should merge these markets with discussion boards where people can list reasons why one stock is worth more or less money... ~ Mike |
Actual questions asked from Mitt Romney Interviews , organized by subject. Click on the question for the answer.
This would make a great tool for anyone who is interviewing Mitt. You can see the questions that have already been asked a number of times, and which ones still need to be asked.